Skip to main content

Cape Hillsborough vs Kensington

Property investment comparison - Cape Hillsborough, QLD 4740 vs Kensington, QLD 4670

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cape Hillsborough wins 2, Kensington wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCape HillsboroughKensington
Median house price$825K$820K
Median unit price-$425K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%3.40%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.52%
1-year house growth-+22.4%
3-year house growth-+45.2%
Vacancy rate1.6%2.4%
Population39722

Cape Hillsborough vs Kensington: what the numbers say

The median house price is $825K in Cape Hillsborough and $820K in Kensington, so Kensington is the cheaper entry point, with Cape Hillsborough houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Cape Hillsborough leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.00%, compared with 3.40% in Kensington, a gap of 0.60 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Cape Hillsborough and 2.4% in Kensington, so landlords in Cape Hillsborough face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kensington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 722 against 39, roughly 19 times the size of Cape Hillsborough; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cape Hillsborough for rental income, Kensington for a lower purchase price, Cape Hillsborough for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison