Skip to main content

Carina Heights vs North Arm

Property investment comparison - Carina Heights, QLD 4152 vs North Arm, QLD 4561

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Carina Heights wins 2, North Arm wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCarina HeightsNorth Arm
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$960K$655K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.56%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.81%4.58%
1-year house growth+9.9%+9.9%
3-year house growth+34.3%+31.9%
Vacancy rate1.0%1.6%
Population7,103734

Carina Heights vs North Arm: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Carina Heights and $1.5M in North Arm, so North Arm is the cheaper entry point, with Carina Heights houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Carina Heights sits at a median of $960K against $655K in North Arm, which makes North Arm the more affordable unit market and Carina Heights the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.9% in both suburbs.

Looking back three years, Carina Heights houses are +34.3% and North Arm houses +31.9%, so Carina Heights has compounded faster than North Arm over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Carina Heights and 1.6% in North Arm, so landlords in Carina Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Carina Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,103 against 734, roughly 10 times the size of North Arm; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: North Arm for a lower purchase price, Carina Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison