Skip to main content

Caringbah vs Ermington

Property investment comparison - Caringbah, NSW 2229 vs Ermington, NSW 2115

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Caringbah wins 3, Ermington wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCaringbahErmington
Median house price$2M$2.0M
Median unit price$905K$800K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.47%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.10%4.95%
1-year house growth+4.0%+3.5%
3-year house growth+18.5%-2.1%
Vacancy rate0.7%1.3%
Population12,57512,686

Caringbah vs Ermington: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2M in Caringbah and $2.0M in Ermington, so Ermington is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Caringbah sits at a median of $905K against $800K in Ermington, which makes Ermington the more affordable unit market and Caringbah the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.0% in Caringbah and +3.5% in Ermington, so recent momentum favours Caringbah, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Caringbah houses are +18.5% and Ermington houses -2.1%, so Caringbah has compounded faster than Ermington over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Caringbah and 1.3% in Ermington, so landlords in Caringbah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ermington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,686 against 12,575, larger than Caringbah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ermington for a lower purchase price, Caringbah for recent price momentum, Caringbah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison