Caringbah South vs Cobaki
Property investment comparison - Caringbah South, NSW 2229 vs Cobaki, NSW 2486
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Caringbah South wins 3, Cobaki wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Caringbah South | Cobaki |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.5M | $2.5M |
| Median unit price | - | $740K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.89% | 2.01% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.75% |
| 1-year house growth | +2.4%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.1% | 3.1% |
| Population | 13,168 | 203 |
Caringbah South vs Cobaki: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.5M in Caringbah South and $2.5M in Cobaki, so Caringbah South is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Caringbah South leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.89%, compared with 2.01% in Cobaki, a gap of 0.88 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Caringbah South and 3.1% in Cobaki, so landlords in Caringbah South face less competition for tenants.
Caringbah South is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,168 against 203, roughly 65 times the size of Cobaki; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Caringbah South for rental income, Caringbah South for a lower purchase price, Caringbah South for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Caringbah South, NSW 2229
Open Caringbah South suburb profileRecent sales in Caringbah South
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison