Carlton vs Nalangil
Property investment comparison - Carlton, VIC 3053 vs Nalangil, VIC 3249
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Carlton wins 1, Nalangil wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Carlton | Nalangil |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.4M | $1.4M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.60% | 1.78% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 7.16% | - |
| 1-year house growth | -1.5% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -15.8% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| Population | 16,055 | 72 |
Carlton vs Nalangil: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.4M in Carlton and $1.4M in Nalangil, so Nalangil is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Carlton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.60%, compared with 1.78% in Nalangil, a gap of 1.82 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.1%.
Carlton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,055 against 72, roughly 223 times the size of Nalangil; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Carlton for rental income, Nalangil for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison