Skip to main content

Carnegie vs Mount Eliza

Property investment comparison - Carnegie, VIC 3163 vs Mount Eliza, VIC 3930

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Carnegie wins 4, Mount Eliza wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCarnegieMount Eliza
Median house price$1.7M$1.7M
Median unit price$640K$750K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.86%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.89%-
1-year house growth+1.0%+1.5%
3-year house growth+0.1%-2.9%
Vacancy rate2.0%2.6%
Population17,90918,734

Carnegie vs Mount Eliza: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.7M in Carnegie and $1.7M in Mount Eliza, so Carnegie is the cheaper entry point, with Mount Eliza houses about 4% dearer.

For units, Carnegie sits at a median of $640K against $750K in Mount Eliza, which makes Carnegie the more affordable unit market and Mount Eliza the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.0% in Carnegie and +1.5% in Mount Eliza, so recent momentum favours Mount Eliza, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Carnegie houses are +0.1% and Mount Eliza houses -2.9%, so Carnegie has compounded faster than Mount Eliza over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Carnegie and 2.6% in Mount Eliza, so landlords in Carnegie face less competition for tenants.

Mount Eliza is the bigger suburb, with a population of 18,734 against 17,909, larger than Carnegie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Carnegie for a lower purchase price, Mount Eliza for recent price momentum, Carnegie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison