Skip to main content

Carramar vs Windang

Property investment comparison - Carramar, NSW 2163 vs Windang, NSW 2528

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Carramar wins 2, Windang wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCarramarWindang
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$410K$640K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.80%3.33%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.82%
1-year house growth+7.5%estimate+5.1%
3-year house growth-+21.0%
Vacancy rate0.8%0.3%
Population3,4752,610

Carramar vs Windang: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Carramar and $1.2M in Windang, so Windang is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Carramar sits at a median of $410K against $640K in Windang, which makes Carramar the more affordable unit market and Windang the pricier one.

On cash flow, Windang leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.33%, compared with 2.80% in Carramar, a gap of 0.53 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.5% in Carramar (an estimate) and +5.1% in Windang, so recent momentum favours Carramar, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Windang and 0.8% in Carramar, so landlords in Windang face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Carramar is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,475 against 2,610, larger than Windang; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Windang for rental income, Windang for a lower purchase price, Carramar for recent price momentum, Windang for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison