Skip to main content

Carroll vs Lockhart

Property investment comparison - Carroll, NSW 2340 vs Lockhart, NSW 2656

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Carroll wins 2, Lockhart wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCarrollLockhart
Median house price$385K$385K
Median unit price$365K$660K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.12%5.79%
Gross rental yield (units)5.99%2.10%
1-year house growth-+11.6%
3-year house growth-+35.5%
Vacancy rate2.1%0.7%
Population3051,019

Carroll vs Lockhart: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $385K in Carroll and $385K in Lockhart.

For units, Carroll sits at a median of $365K against $660K in Lockhart, which makes Carroll the more affordable unit market and Lockhart the pricier one.

On cash flow, Lockhart leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.79%, compared with 5.12% in Carroll, a gap of 0.67 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Lockhart and 2.1% in Carroll, so landlords in Lockhart face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lockhart is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,019 against 305, roughly 3.3 times the size of Carroll; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lockhart for rental income, Lockhart for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison