Skip to main content

Carroll vs Wellington

Property investment comparison - Carroll, NSW 2340 vs Wellington, NSW 2820

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Carroll wins 2, Wellington wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCarrollWellington
Median house price$385K$380K
Median unit price$365K$425K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.12%6.41%
Gross rental yield (units)5.99%4.05%
1-year house growth-+20.1%
3-year house growth-+32.5%
Vacancy rate2.1%1.3%
Population3054,096

Carroll vs Wellington: what the numbers say

The median house price is $385K in Carroll and $380K in Wellington, so Wellington is the cheaper entry point, with Carroll houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Carroll sits at a median of $365K against $425K in Wellington, which makes Carroll the more affordable unit market and Wellington the pricier one.

On cash flow, Wellington leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.41%, compared with 5.12% in Carroll, a gap of 1.29 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Wellington and 2.1% in Carroll, so landlords in Wellington face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wellington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,096 against 305, roughly 13 times the size of Carroll; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wellington for rental income, Wellington for a lower purchase price, Wellington for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison