Casino vs Keepit
Property investment comparison - Casino, NSW 2470 vs Keepit, NSW 2340
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Casino wins 1, Keepit wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Casino | Keepit |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $530K | $530K |
| Median unit price | - | $360K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.40% | 5.57% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.94% | 6.49% |
| 1-year house growth | +10.1%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.1% | 2.0% |
| Population | 10,930 | 16 |
Casino vs Keepit: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $530K in Casino and $530K in Keepit.
On cash flow, Keepit leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.57%, compared with 5.40% in Casino, a gap of 0.17 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Casino and 2.0% in Keepit, so landlords in Casino face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Casino is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,930 against 16, roughly 683 times the size of Keepit; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Keepit for rental income, Casino for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison