Skip to main content

Castlereagh vs Newport

Property investment comparison - Castlereagh, NSW 2749 vs Newport, NSW 2106

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Castlereagh wins 2, Newport wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCastlereaghNewport
Median house price$3.1M$3.1M
Median unit price$715K$1.4M
Gross rental yield (houses)1.60%2.37%
Gross rental yield (units)4.17%3.19%
1-year house growth-+0.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.5%1.5%
Population1,2489,659

Castlereagh vs Newport: what the numbers say

The median house price is $3.1M in Castlereagh and $3.1M in Newport, so Newport is the cheaper entry point, with Castlereagh houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Castlereagh sits at a median of $715K against $1.4M in Newport, which makes Castlereagh the more affordable unit market and Newport the pricier one.

On cash flow, Newport leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.37%, compared with 1.60% in Castlereagh, a gap of 0.77 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Newport and 2.5% in Castlereagh, so landlords in Newport face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Newport is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,659 against 1,248, roughly 8 times the size of Castlereagh; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Newport for rental income, Newport for a lower purchase price, Newport for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison