Skip to main content

Casuarina vs Mullaloo

Property investment comparison - Casuarina, WA 6167 vs Mullaloo, WA 6027

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Casuarina wins 2, Mullaloo wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCasuarinaMullaloo
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$260K$1.4M
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.20%
Gross rental yield (units)7.91%2.79%
1-year house growth+13.4%estimate+14.8%
3-year house growth-+59.1%
Vacancy rate2.9%0.7%
Population1,9876,190

Casuarina vs Mullaloo: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Casuarina and $1.5M in Mullaloo, so Mullaloo is the cheaper entry point, with Casuarina houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Casuarina sits at a median of $260K against $1.4M in Mullaloo, which makes Casuarina the more affordable unit market and Mullaloo the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.4% in Casuarina (an estimate) and +14.8% in Mullaloo, so recent momentum favours Mullaloo, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Mullaloo and 2.9% in Casuarina, so landlords in Mullaloo face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mullaloo is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,190 against 1,987, roughly 3.1 times the size of Casuarina; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mullaloo for a lower purchase price, Mullaloo for recent price momentum, Mullaloo for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison