Skip to main content

Casuarina vs Willetton

Property investment comparison - Casuarina, WA 6167 vs Willetton, WA 6155

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Casuarina wins 3, Willetton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCasuarinaWilletton
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$260K$850K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.13%
Gross rental yield (units)7.91%4.40%
1-year house growth+13.4%estimate+19.0%
3-year house growth-+58.7%
Vacancy rate2.9%1.4%
Population1,98719,262

Casuarina vs Willetton: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Casuarina and $1.5M in Willetton, so Casuarina is the cheaper entry point, with Willetton houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Casuarina sits at a median of $260K against $850K in Willetton, which makes Casuarina the more affordable unit market and Willetton the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.4% in Casuarina (an estimate) and +19.0% in Willetton, so recent momentum favours Willetton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Willetton and 2.9% in Casuarina, so landlords in Willetton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Willetton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,262 against 1,987, roughly 10 times the size of Casuarina; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Casuarina for a lower purchase price, Willetton for recent price momentum, Willetton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison