Skip to main content

Casula vs Green Point

Property investment comparison - Casula, NSW 2170 vs Green Point, NSW 2251

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Casula wins 3, Green Point wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCasulaGreen Point
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$860K$830K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.10%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.96%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate+4.5%
3-year house growth-+16.0%
Vacancy rate1.6%2.0%
Population16,5846,810

Casula vs Green Point: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Casula and $1.3M in Green Point, so Casula is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Casula sits at a median of $860K against $830K in Green Point, which makes Green Point the more affordable unit market and Casula the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Casula (an estimate) and +4.5% in Green Point, so recent momentum favours Casula, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Casula and 2.0% in Green Point, so landlords in Casula face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Casula is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,584 against 6,810, roughly 2.4 times the size of Green Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Casula for a lower purchase price, Casula for recent price momentum, Casula for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison