Skip to main content

Cedar Vale vs Hampton

Property investment comparison - Cedar Vale, QLD 4285 vs Hampton, QLD 4352

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cedar Vale wins 2, Hampton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCedar ValeHampton
Median house price$1.1M$1.2M
Median unit price$2.8M$285K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.09%-
Gross rental yield (units)-9.33%
1-year house growth+17.8%estimate+20.0%
3-year house growth-+38.1%
Vacancy rate0.8%4.6%
Population2,856469

Cedar Vale vs Hampton: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Cedar Vale and $1.2M in Hampton, so Cedar Vale is the cheaper entry point, with Hampton houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Cedar Vale sits at a median of $2.8M against $285K in Hampton, which makes Hampton the more affordable unit market and Cedar Vale the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.8% in Cedar Vale (an estimate) and +20.0% in Hampton, so recent momentum favours Hampton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Cedar Vale and 4.6% in Hampton, so landlords in Cedar Vale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Cedar Vale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,856 against 469, roughly 6 times the size of Hampton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cedar Vale for a lower purchase price, Hampton for recent price momentum, Cedar Vale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison