Skip to main content

Charlemont vs Ruffy

Property investment comparison - Charlemont, VIC 3217 vs Ruffy, VIC 3666

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Charlemont wins 2, Ruffy wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCharlemontRuffy
Median house price$645K$645K
Median unit price$475K$515K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.20%3.61%
Gross rental yield (units)2.67%3.27%
1-year house growth+2.5%-
3-year house growth+4.9%-
Vacancy rate2.4%0.4%
Population2,612164

Charlemont vs Ruffy: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $645K in Charlemont and $645K in Ruffy.

For units, Charlemont sits at a median of $475K against $515K in Ruffy, which makes Charlemont the more affordable unit market and Ruffy the pricier one.

On cash flow, Charlemont leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.20%, compared with 3.61% in Ruffy, a gap of 0.59 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Ruffy and 2.4% in Charlemont, so landlords in Ruffy face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Charlemont is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,612 against 164, roughly 16 times the size of Ruffy; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Charlemont for rental income, Ruffy for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison