Charlemont vs Swanpool
Property investment comparison - Charlemont, VIC 3217 vs Swanpool, VIC 3673
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Charlemont wins 2, Swanpool wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Charlemont | Swanpool |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $645K | $645K |
| Median unit price | $475K | $280K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.20% | 3.90% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.67% | 3.51% |
| 1-year house growth | +2.5% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +4.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.4% | 3.0% |
| Population | 2,612 | 227 |
Charlemont vs Swanpool: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $645K in Charlemont and $645K in Swanpool.
For units, Charlemont sits at a median of $475K against $280K in Swanpool, which makes Swanpool the more affordable unit market and Charlemont the pricier one.
On cash flow, Charlemont leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.20%, compared with 3.90% in Swanpool, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Charlemont and 3.0% in Swanpool, so landlords in Charlemont face less competition for tenants.
Charlemont is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,612 against 227, roughly 12 times the size of Swanpool; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Charlemont for rental income, Charlemont for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison