Charlemont vs The Sisters
Property investment comparison - Charlemont, VIC 3217 vs The Sisters, VIC 3265
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Charlemont wins 2, The Sisters wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Charlemont | The Sisters |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $645K | $640K |
| Median unit price | $475K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.20% | 3.78% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.67% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +2.5% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +4.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.4% | 3.8% |
| Population | 2,612 | 110 |
Charlemont vs The Sisters: what the numbers say
The median house price is $645K in Charlemont and $640K in The Sisters, so The Sisters is the cheaper entry point, with Charlemont houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Charlemont leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.20%, compared with 3.78% in The Sisters, a gap of 0.42 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Charlemont and 3.8% in The Sisters, so landlords in Charlemont face less competition for tenants.
Charlemont is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,612 against 110, roughly 24 times the size of The Sisters; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Charlemont for rental income, The Sisters for a lower purchase price, Charlemont for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison