Childers vs Waurn Ponds
Property investment comparison - Childers, VIC 3824 vs Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Childers wins 2, Waurn Ponds wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Childers | Waurn Ponds |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $805K | $810K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.77% | 3.80% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +5.4% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -4.4% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 3.7% |
| Population | 91 | 4,956 |
Childers vs Waurn Ponds: what the numbers say
The median house price is $805K in Childers and $810K in Waurn Ponds, so Childers is the cheaper entry point, with Waurn Ponds houses about 1% dearer.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.77% in Childers and 3.80% in Waurn Ponds, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Childers and 3.7% in Waurn Ponds, so landlords in Childers face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Waurn Ponds is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,956 against 91, roughly 54 times the size of Childers; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Childers for a lower purchase price, Childers for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison