Chiswick vs Fairlight
Property investment comparison - Chiswick, NSW 2046 vs Fairlight, NSW 2094
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Chiswick wins 3, Fairlight wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Chiswick | Fairlight |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $4.1M | $4.1M |
| Median unit price | $1.2M | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.35% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.83% | 2.45% |
| 1-year house growth | +7.2%estimate | +2.3%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.9% | 1.8% |
| Population | 2,909 | 6,141 |
Chiswick vs Fairlight: what the numbers say
The median house price is $4.1M in Chiswick and $4.1M in Fairlight, so Chiswick is the cheaper entry point.
Over the past year house prices moved +7.2% in Chiswick (an estimate) and +2.3% in Fairlight (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Chiswick, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Fairlight and 2.9% in Chiswick, so landlords in Fairlight face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Fairlight is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,141 against 2,909, roughly 2.1 times the size of Chiswick; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Chiswick for a lower purchase price, Chiswick for recent price momentum, Fairlight for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison