Churchill vs Murraydale
Property investment comparison - Churchill, VIC 3842 vs Murraydale, VIC 3586
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Churchill wins 1, Murraydale wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Churchill | Murraydale |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $460K | $455K |
| Median unit price | $350K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.01% | 5.23% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.63% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +16.5% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +29.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| Population | 4,924 | 105 |
Churchill vs Murraydale: what the numbers say
The median house price is $460K in Churchill and $455K in Murraydale, so Murraydale is the cheaper entry point, with Churchill houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Murraydale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.23%, compared with 5.01% in Churchill, a gap of 0.22 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.8%.
Churchill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,924 against 105, roughly 47 times the size of Murraydale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Murraydale for rental income, Murraydale for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison