Skip to main content

Clarinda vs Strathkellar

Property investment comparison - Clarinda, VIC 3169 vs Strathkellar, VIC 3301

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Clarinda wins 2, Strathkellar wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricClarindaStrathkellar
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$825K$560K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.22%2.23%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.46%
1-year house growth-3.1%-
3-year house growth+10.5%-
Vacancy rate1.1%14.3%
Population7,44184

Clarinda vs Strathkellar: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Clarinda and $1.1M in Strathkellar.

For units, Clarinda sits at a median of $825K against $560K in Strathkellar, which makes Strathkellar the more affordable unit market and Clarinda the pricier one.

On cash flow, Clarinda leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.22%, compared with 2.23% in Strathkellar, a gap of 0.99 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Clarinda and 14.3% in Strathkellar, so landlords in Clarinda face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Clarinda is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,441 against 84, roughly 89 times the size of Strathkellar; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Clarinda for rental income, Clarinda for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison