Skip to main content

Clayton South vs Emerald

Property investment comparison - Clayton South, VIC 3169 vs Emerald, VIC 3782

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Clayton South wins 3, Emerald wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricClayton SouthEmerald
Median house price$985K$980K
Median unit price$645K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.43%3.39%
Gross rental yield (units)4.78%3.97%
1-year house growth+1.1%estimate+2.0%
3-year house growth-+7.0%
Vacancy rate1.6%1.9%
Population13,3815,890

Clayton South vs Emerald: what the numbers say

The median house price is $985K in Clayton South and $980K in Emerald, so Emerald is the cheaper entry point, with Clayton South houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.43% in Clayton South and 3.39% in Emerald, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Clayton South (an estimate) and +2.0% in Emerald, so recent momentum favours Emerald, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Clayton South and 1.9% in Emerald, so landlords in Clayton South face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Clayton South is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,381 against 5,890, roughly 2.3 times the size of Emerald; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Emerald for a lower purchase price, Emerald for recent price momentum, Clayton South for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Clayton South vs Emerald: Suburb Comparison 2026