Clayton South vs Mount Mercer
Property investment comparison - Clayton South, VIC 3169 vs Mount Mercer, VIC 3352
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Clayton South wins 1, Mount Mercer wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Clayton South | Mount Mercer |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $985K | $980K |
| Median unit price | $645K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.43% | 2.57% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.78% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 1.6% |
| Population | 13,381 | 94 |
Clayton South vs Mount Mercer: what the numbers say
The median house price is $985K in Clayton South and $980K in Mount Mercer, so Mount Mercer is the cheaper entry point, with Clayton South houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Clayton South leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.43%, compared with 2.57% in Mount Mercer, a gap of 0.86 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.6%.
Clayton South is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,381 against 94, roughly 142 times the size of Mount Mercer; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Clayton South for rental income, Mount Mercer for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison