Skip to main content

Clayton South vs Steiglitz

Property investment comparison - Clayton South, VIC 3169 vs Steiglitz, VIC 3331

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Clayton South wins 2, Steiglitz wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricClayton SouthSteiglitz
Median house price$985K$990K
Median unit price$645K$370K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.43%2.72%
Gross rental yield (units)4.78%6.10%
1-year house growth+1.1%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.6%0.9%
Population13,38161

Clayton South vs Steiglitz: what the numbers say

The median house price is $985K in Clayton South and $990K in Steiglitz, so Clayton South is the cheaper entry point, with Steiglitz houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Clayton South sits at a median of $645K against $370K in Steiglitz, which makes Steiglitz the more affordable unit market and Clayton South the pricier one.

On cash flow, Clayton South leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.43%, compared with 2.72% in Steiglitz, a gap of 0.71 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Steiglitz and 1.6% in Clayton South, so landlords in Steiglitz face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Clayton South is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,381 against 61, roughly 219 times the size of Steiglitz; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Clayton South for rental income, Clayton South for a lower purchase price, Steiglitz for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison