Skip to main content

Clayton South vs Tremont

Property investment comparison - Clayton South, VIC 3169 vs Tremont, VIC 3785

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Clayton South wins 2, Tremont wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricClayton SouthTremont
Median house price$985K$990K
Median unit price$645K$490K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.43%4.08%
Gross rental yield (units)4.78%2.99%
1-year house growth+1.1%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.6%1.1%
Population13,38169

Clayton South vs Tremont: what the numbers say

The median house price is $985K in Clayton South and $990K in Tremont, so Clayton South is the cheaper entry point, with Tremont houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Clayton South sits at a median of $645K against $490K in Tremont, which makes Tremont the more affordable unit market and Clayton South the pricier one.

On cash flow, Tremont leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.08%, compared with 3.43% in Clayton South, a gap of 0.65 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Tremont and 1.6% in Clayton South, so landlords in Tremont face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Clayton South is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,381 against 69, roughly 194 times the size of Tremont; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tremont for rental income, Clayton South for a lower purchase price, Tremont for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison