Clayton vs Dalmore
Property investment comparison - Clayton, VIC 3168 vs Dalmore, VIC 3981
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Clayton wins 1, Dalmore wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Clayton | Dalmore |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Median unit price | - | $565K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.57% | 2.87% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.36% |
| 1-year house growth | -1.8% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +9.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 4.9% |
| Population | 18,988 | 142 |
Clayton vs Dalmore: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Clayton and $1.3M in Dalmore.
On cash flow, Dalmore leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.87%, compared with 2.57% in Clayton, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Clayton and 4.9% in Dalmore, so landlords in Clayton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Clayton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 18,988 against 142, roughly 134 times the size of Dalmore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Dalmore for rental income, Clayton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison