Skip to main content

Cliftleigh vs Kanwal

Property investment comparison - Cliftleigh, NSW 2321 vs Kanwal, NSW 2259

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cliftleigh wins 3, Kanwal wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCliftleighKanwal
Median house price$830K$830K
Median unit price$610K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.34%3.90%
Gross rental yield (units)4.81%4.30%
1-year house growth+13.3%estimate+7.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.9%0.3%
Population2,3094,194

Cliftleigh vs Kanwal: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $830K in Cliftleigh and $830K in Kanwal.

On cash flow, Cliftleigh leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.34%, compared with 3.90% in Kanwal, a gap of 0.44 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.3% in Cliftleigh (an estimate) and +7.8% in Kanwal (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Cliftleigh, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Kanwal and 1.9% in Cliftleigh, so landlords in Kanwal face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kanwal is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,194 against 2,309, larger than Cliftleigh; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cliftleigh for rental income, Cliftleigh for recent price momentum, Kanwal for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison