Cobaki vs Waitara
Property investment comparison - Cobaki, NSW 2486 vs Waitara, NSW 2077
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cobaki wins 1, Waitara wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Cobaki | Waitara |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.5M | $2.5M |
| Median unit price | $740K | $800K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.01% | 2.02% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.75% | 4.76% |
| 1-year house growth | - | -5.5%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 3.1% | 1.2% |
| Population | 203 | 7,837 |
Cobaki vs Waitara: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.5M in Cobaki and $2.5M in Waitara, so Waitara is the cheaper entry point.
For units, Cobaki sits at a median of $740K against $800K in Waitara, which makes Cobaki the more affordable unit market and Waitara the pricier one.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 2.01% in Cobaki and 2.02% in Waitara, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Waitara and 3.1% in Cobaki, so landlords in Waitara face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Waitara is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,837 against 203, roughly 39 times the size of Cobaki; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Waitara for a lower purchase price, Waitara for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison