Skip to main content

Cobar vs Moree

Property investment comparison - Cobar, NSW 2835 vs Moree, NSW 2400

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cobar wins 3, Moree wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCobarMoree
Median house price$320K$335K
Median unit price$195K$185K
Gross rental yield (houses)6.55%7.00%
Gross rental yield (units)7.76%-
1-year house growth+13.6%estimate+5.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.3%1.7%
Population3,6038,962

Cobar vs Moree: what the numbers say

The median house price is $320K in Cobar and $335K in Moree, so Cobar is the cheaper entry point, with Moree houses about 5% dearer.

For units, Cobar sits at a median of $195K against $185K in Moree, which makes Moree the more affordable unit market and Cobar the pricier one.

On cash flow, Moree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 7.00%, compared with 6.55% in Cobar, a gap of 0.45 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.6% in Cobar (an estimate) and +5.8% in Moree (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Cobar, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Cobar and 1.7% in Moree, so landlords in Cobar face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Moree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,962 against 3,603, roughly 2.5 times the size of Cobar; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Moree for rental income, Cobar for a lower purchase price, Cobar for recent price momentum, Cobar for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison