Cobblebank vs Murrawee
Property investment comparison - Cobblebank, VIC 3338 vs Murrawee, VIC 3586
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cobblebank wins 0, Murrawee wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Cobblebank | Murrawee |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $645K | $645K |
| Median unit price | - | $390K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.71% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.35% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +2.8% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -0.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.4% | 1.6% |
| Population | 3,601 | 126 |
Cobblebank vs Murrawee: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $645K in Cobblebank and $645K in Murrawee.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Murrawee and 2.4% in Cobblebank, so landlords in Murrawee face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Cobblebank is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,601 against 126, roughly 29 times the size of Murrawee; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Murrawee for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison