Cobram vs Moolerr
Property investment comparison - Cobram, VIC 3644 vs Moolerr, VIC 3477
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cobram wins 2, Moolerr wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Cobram | Moolerr |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $440K | $445K |
| Median unit price | $330K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.66% | 1.67% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.52% | - |
| 1-year house growth | -3.1%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | - |
| Population | 6,148 | 23 |
Cobram vs Moolerr: what the numbers say
The median house price is $440K in Cobram and $445K in Moolerr, so Cobram is the cheaper entry point, with Moolerr houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Cobram leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.66%, compared with 1.67% in Moolerr, a gap of 3.99 percentage points.
Cobram is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,148 against 23, roughly 267 times the size of Moolerr; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Cobram for rental income, Cobram for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison