Skip to main content

Cobram vs Willaura North

Property investment comparison - Cobram, VIC 3644 vs Willaura North, VIC 3379

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cobram wins 3, Willaura North wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCobramWillaura North
Median house price$440K$445K
Median unit price$330K-
Gross rental yield (houses)5.66%4.47%
Gross rental yield (units)5.52%-
1-year house growth-3.1%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.3%2.3%
Population6,14833

Cobram vs Willaura North: what the numbers say

The median house price is $440K in Cobram and $445K in Willaura North, so Cobram is the cheaper entry point, with Willaura North houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Cobram leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.66%, compared with 4.47% in Willaura North, a gap of 1.19 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Cobram and 2.3% in Willaura North, so landlords in Cobram face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Cobram is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,148 against 33, roughly 186 times the size of Willaura North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cobram for rental income, Cobram for a lower purchase price, Cobram for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison