Skip to main content

Cobram vs Yarram

Property investment comparison - Cobram, VIC 3644 vs Yarram, VIC 3971

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cobram wins 1, Yarram wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCobramYarram
Median house price$440K$415K
Median unit price$330K-
Gross rental yield (houses)5.66%4.45%
Gross rental yield (units)5.52%-
1-year house growth-3.1%estimate+7.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.3%0.1%
Population6,1482,136

Cobram vs Yarram: what the numbers say

The median house price is $440K in Cobram and $415K in Yarram, so Yarram is the cheaper entry point, with Cobram houses about 6% dearer.

On cash flow, Cobram leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.66%, compared with 4.45% in Yarram, a gap of 1.21 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -3.1% in Cobram (an estimate) and +7.7% in Yarram (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Yarram, while Cobram went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Yarram and 1.3% in Cobram, so landlords in Yarram face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Cobram is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,148 against 2,136, roughly 2.9 times the size of Yarram; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cobram for rental income, Yarram for a lower purchase price, Yarram for recent price momentum, Yarram for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison