Coghills Creek vs Deer Park
Property investment comparison - Coghills Creek, VIC 3364 vs Deer Park, VIC 3023
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coghills Creek wins 2, Deer Park wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Coghills Creek | Deer Park |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $710K | $710K |
| Median unit price | - | $570K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.04% | 3.75% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.36% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +6.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 1.6% |
| Population | 80 | 18,145 |
Coghills Creek vs Deer Park: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $710K in Coghills Creek and $710K in Deer Park.
On cash flow, Coghills Creek leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.04%, compared with 3.75% in Deer Park, a gap of 0.29 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.6%.
Deer Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 18,145 against 80, roughly 227 times the size of Coghills Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Coghills Creek for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Coghills Creek, VIC 3364
Open Coghills Creek suburb profileRecent sales in Coghills Creek
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison