Skip to main content

Coghills Creek vs Mickleham

Property investment comparison - Coghills Creek, VIC 3364 vs Mickleham, VIC 3064

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coghills Creek wins 2, Mickleham wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCoghills CreekMickleham
Median house price$710K$710K
Median unit price-$610K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.04%4.02%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.19%
1-year house growth-+4.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.6%3.8%
Population8017,452

Coghills Creek vs Mickleham: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $710K in Coghills Creek and $710K in Mickleham.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.04% in Coghills Creek and 4.02% in Mickleham, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Coghills Creek and 3.8% in Mickleham, so landlords in Coghills Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mickleham is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,452 against 80, roughly 218 times the size of Coghills Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Coghills Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison