Skip to main content

Coimadai vs Essendon

Property investment comparison - Coimadai, VIC 3340 vs Essendon, VIC 3040

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coimadai wins 2, Essendon wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCoimadaiEssendon
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$660K$600K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.82%2.28%
Gross rental yield (units)3.38%4.59%
1-year house growth-+6.8%
3-year house growth-+1.4%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.5%
Population40921,240

Coimadai vs Essendon: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Coimadai and $1.8M in Essendon, so Coimadai is the cheaper entry point, with Essendon houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Coimadai sits at a median of $660K against $600K in Essendon, which makes Essendon the more affordable unit market and Coimadai the pricier one.

On cash flow, Essendon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.28%, compared with 1.82% in Coimadai, a gap of 0.46 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Coimadai and 1.5% in Essendon, so landlords in Coimadai face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Essendon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 21,240 against 409, roughly 52 times the size of Coimadai; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Essendon for rental income, Coimadai for a lower purchase price, Coimadai for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison