Coimadai vs Fairfield
Property investment comparison - Coimadai, VIC 3340 vs Fairfield, VIC 3078
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coimadai wins 0, Fairfield wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Coimadai | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | $1.8M |
| Median unit price | $660K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.82% | 2.59% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.38% | 4.42% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +6.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +13.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 1.0% |
| Population | 409 | 6,535 |
Coimadai vs Fairfield: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.8M in Coimadai and $1.8M in Fairfield, so Fairfield is the cheaper entry point, with Coimadai houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Fairfield leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.59%, compared with 1.82% in Coimadai, a gap of 0.77 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Fairfield and 1.4% in Coimadai, so landlords in Fairfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Fairfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,535 against 409, roughly 16 times the size of Coimadai; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Fairfield for rental income, Fairfield for a lower purchase price, Fairfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison