Skip to main content

Coimadai vs Ormond

Property investment comparison - Coimadai, VIC 3340 vs Ormond, VIC 3204

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coimadai wins 3, Ormond wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCoimadaiOrmond
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$660K$720K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.82%2.59%
Gross rental yield (units)3.38%4.06%
1-year house growth--5.0%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.4%1.9%
Population4098,328

Coimadai vs Ormond: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Coimadai and $1.8M in Ormond, so Coimadai is the cheaper entry point, with Ormond houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Coimadai sits at a median of $660K against $720K in Ormond, which makes Coimadai the more affordable unit market and Ormond the pricier one.

On cash flow, Ormond leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.59%, compared with 1.82% in Coimadai, a gap of 0.77 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Coimadai and 1.9% in Ormond, so landlords in Coimadai face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ormond is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,328 against 409, roughly 20 times the size of Coimadai; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ormond for rental income, Coimadai for a lower purchase price, Coimadai for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison