Skip to main content

Collingullie vs Frederickton

Property investment comparison - Collingullie, NSW 2650 vs Frederickton, NSW 2440

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Collingullie wins 2, Frederickton wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCollingullieFrederickton
Median house price$540K$530K
Median unit price$380K-
Gross rental yield (houses)5.20%4.87%
Gross rental yield (units)4.94%-
1-year house growth-+1.6%
3-year house growth-+6.1%
Vacancy rate1.2%1.3%
Population2581,452

Collingullie vs Frederickton: what the numbers say

The median house price is $540K in Collingullie and $530K in Frederickton, so Frederickton is the cheaper entry point, with Collingullie houses about 2% dearer.

On cash flow, Collingullie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.20%, compared with 4.87% in Frederickton, a gap of 0.33 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Collingullie and 1.3% in Frederickton, so landlords in Collingullie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Frederickton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,452 against 258, roughly 6 times the size of Collingullie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Collingullie for rental income, Frederickton for a lower purchase price, Collingullie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison