Skip to main content

Collingwood Park vs Iveragh

Property investment comparison - Collingwood Park, QLD 4301 vs Iveragh, QLD 4680

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Collingwood Park wins 2, Iveragh wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCollingwood ParkIveragh
Median house price$900K$895K
Median unit price$615K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.80%2.75%
Gross rental yield (units)4.20%-
1-year house growth+19.2%+18.3%
3-year house growth+55.9%-
Vacancy rate2.1%2.0%
Population9,246122

Collingwood Park vs Iveragh: what the numbers say

The median house price is $900K in Collingwood Park and $895K in Iveragh, so Iveragh is the cheaper entry point, with Collingwood Park houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Collingwood Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.80%, compared with 2.75% in Iveragh, a gap of 1.05 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.2% in Collingwood Park and +18.3% in Iveragh, so recent momentum favours Collingwood Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Iveragh and 2.1% in Collingwood Park, so landlords in Iveragh face less competition for tenants.

Collingwood Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,246 against 122, roughly 76 times the size of Iveragh; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Collingwood Park for rental income, Iveragh for a lower purchase price, Collingwood Park for recent price momentum, Iveragh for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison