Skip to main content

Collingwood Park vs Meldale

Property investment comparison - Collingwood Park, QLD 4301 vs Meldale, QLD 4510

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Collingwood Park wins 1, Meldale wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCollingwood ParkMeldale
Median house price$900K$895K
Median unit price$615K$490K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.80%2.50%
Gross rental yield (units)4.20%5.89%
1-year house growth+19.2%-
3-year house growth+55.9%-
Vacancy rate2.1%0.8%
Population9,246230

Collingwood Park vs Meldale: what the numbers say

The median house price is $900K in Collingwood Park and $895K in Meldale, so Meldale is the cheaper entry point, with Collingwood Park houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Collingwood Park sits at a median of $615K against $490K in Meldale, which makes Meldale the more affordable unit market and Collingwood Park the pricier one.

On cash flow, Collingwood Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.80%, compared with 2.50% in Meldale, a gap of 1.30 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Meldale and 2.1% in Collingwood Park, so landlords in Meldale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Collingwood Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,246 against 230, roughly 40 times the size of Meldale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Collingwood Park for rental income, Meldale for a lower purchase price, Meldale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison