Skip to main content

Collingwood Park vs The Vines

Property investment comparison - Collingwood Park, WA 6330 vs The Vines, WA 6069

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Collingwood Park wins 0, The Vines wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCollingwood ParkThe Vines
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$600K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.14%3.67%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.68%
1-year house growth-+13.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate3.1%0.5%
Population2055,848

Collingwood Park vs The Vines: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Collingwood Park and $1.2M in The Vines, so The Vines is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, The Vines leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.67%, compared with 2.14% in Collingwood Park, a gap of 1.53 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in The Vines and 3.1% in Collingwood Park, so landlords in The Vines face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

The Vines is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,848 against 205, roughly 29 times the size of Collingwood Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: The Vines for rental income, The Vines for a lower purchase price, The Vines for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison