Skip to main content

Concord vs Naremburn

Property investment comparison - Concord, NSW 2137 vs Naremburn, NSW 2065

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Concord wins 0, Naremburn wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricConcordNaremburn
Median house price$3.3M$3.2M
Median unit price$1.6M$1.4M
Gross rental yield (houses)1.78%-
Gross rental yield (units)-3.27%
1-year house growth-0.9%estimate+1.3%
3-year house growth-+3.5%
Vacancy rate2.2%1.1%
Population14,5515,924

Concord vs Naremburn: what the numbers say

The median house price is $3.3M in Concord and $3.2M in Naremburn, so Naremburn is the cheaper entry point, with Concord houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Concord sits at a median of $1.6M against $1.4M in Naremburn, which makes Naremburn the more affordable unit market and Concord the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.9% in Concord (an estimate) and +1.3% in Naremburn, so recent momentum favours Naremburn, while Concord went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Naremburn and 2.2% in Concord, so landlords in Naremburn face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Concord is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,551 against 5,924, roughly 2.5 times the size of Naremburn; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Naremburn for a lower purchase price, Naremburn for recent price momentum, Naremburn for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison