Concord vs Newrybar
Property investment comparison - Concord, NSW 2137 vs Newrybar, NSW 2479
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Concord wins 1, Newrybar wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Concord | Newrybar |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $3.3M | $3.2M |
| Median unit price | $1.6M | $1.1M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.78% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.47% |
| 1-year house growth | -0.9%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.2% | 4.3% |
| Population | 14,551 | 532 |
Concord vs Newrybar: what the numbers say
The median house price is $3.3M in Concord and $3.2M in Newrybar, so Newrybar is the cheaper entry point.
For units, Concord sits at a median of $1.6M against $1.1M in Newrybar, which makes Newrybar the more affordable unit market and Concord the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 2.2% in Concord and 4.3% in Newrybar, so landlords in Concord face less competition for tenants.
Concord is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,551 against 532, roughly 27 times the size of Newrybar; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Newrybar for a lower purchase price, Concord for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison