Skip to main content

Constitution Hill vs Tarlo

Property investment comparison - Constitution Hill, NSW 2145 vs Tarlo, NSW 2580

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Constitution Hill wins 3, Tarlo wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricConstitution HillTarlo
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price-$560K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.69%1.96%
Gross rental yield (units)4.77%3.95%
1-year house growth-1.0%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.9%6.0%
Population4,030171

Constitution Hill vs Tarlo: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.5M in Constitution Hill and $1.5M in Tarlo.

On cash flow, Constitution Hill leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.69%, compared with 1.96% in Tarlo, a gap of 0.73 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Constitution Hill and 6.0% in Tarlo, so landlords in Constitution Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Constitution Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,030 against 171, roughly 24 times the size of Tarlo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Constitution Hill for rental income, Constitution Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison