Skip to main content

Coogee vs Ocean Reef

Property investment comparison - Coogee, WA 6166 vs Ocean Reef, WA 6027

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coogee wins 2, Ocean Reef wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCoogeeOcean Reef
Median house price$1.6M$1.5M
Median unit price$365K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.60%3.69%
Gross rental yield (units)4.78%6.23%
1-year house growth+18.2%+16.1%
3-year house growth+43.9%+52.9%
Vacancy rate0.8%1.7%
Population5,3458,125

Coogee vs Ocean Reef: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.6M in Coogee and $1.5M in Ocean Reef, so Ocean Reef is the cheaper entry point, with Coogee houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Ocean Reef leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.69%, compared with 3.60% in Coogee, a gap of 0.09 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.2% in Coogee and +16.1% in Ocean Reef, so recent momentum favours Coogee, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Coogee houses are +43.9% and Ocean Reef houses +52.9%, so Ocean Reef has compounded faster than Coogee over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Coogee and 1.7% in Ocean Reef, so landlords in Coogee face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ocean Reef is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,125 against 5,345, larger than Coogee; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ocean Reef for rental income, Ocean Reef for a lower purchase price, Coogee for recent price momentum, Coogee for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison