Coomealla vs Manildra
Property investment comparison - Coomealla, NSW 2717 vs Manildra, NSW 2865
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coomealla wins 1, Manildra wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Coomealla | Manildra |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $500K | $490K |
| Median unit price | - | $525K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.96% | 3.56% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.53% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +11.3%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 1.9% |
| Population | 748 | 822 |
Coomealla vs Manildra: what the numbers say
The median house price is $500K in Coomealla and $490K in Manildra, so Manildra is the cheaper entry point, with Coomealla houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Manildra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.56%, compared with 2.96% in Coomealla, a gap of 0.60 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Coomealla and 1.9% in Manildra, so landlords in Coomealla face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Manildra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 822 against 748, larger than Coomealla; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Manildra for rental income, Manildra for a lower purchase price, Coomealla for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison