Coomealla vs Yenda
Property investment comparison - Coomealla, NSW 2717 vs Yenda, NSW 2681
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coomealla wins 1, Yenda wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Coomealla | Yenda |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $500K | $490K |
| Median unit price | - | $355K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.96% | 4.67% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.08% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +2.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 2.0% |
| Population | 748 | 1,564 |
Coomealla vs Yenda: what the numbers say
The median house price is $500K in Coomealla and $490K in Yenda, so Yenda is the cheaper entry point, with Coomealla houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Yenda leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.67%, compared with 2.96% in Coomealla, a gap of 1.71 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Coomealla and 2.0% in Yenda, so landlords in Coomealla face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Yenda is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,564 against 748, roughly 2.1 times the size of Coomealla; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Yenda for rental income, Yenda for a lower purchase price, Coomealla for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison