Skip to main content

Coomera vs Highfields

Property investment comparison - Coomera, QLD 4209 vs Highfields, QLD 4352

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coomera wins 1, Highfields wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCoomeraHighfields
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$800K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.39%
Gross rental yield (units)4.50%-
1-year house growth+16.8%+15.5%
3-year house growth+43.8%+44.2%
Vacancy rate1.2%0.3%
Population20,2258,568

Coomera vs Highfields: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Coomera and $1.1M in Highfields.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.8% in Coomera and +15.5% in Highfields, so recent momentum favours Coomera, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Coomera houses are +43.8% and Highfields houses +44.2%, so Highfields has compounded faster than Coomera over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Highfields and 1.2% in Coomera, so landlords in Highfields face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Coomera is the bigger suburb, with a population of 20,225 against 8,568, roughly 2.4 times the size of Highfields; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Coomera for recent price momentum, Highfields for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison